Refuting Phillip Dennis’s Errors in Physics, ASC, and Philosophy – Part 3

We have been analyzing the claims of Phillip Dennis and his criticism of the ASC model.  In particular, Dennis claims to have refuted the conventionality thesis – Einstein’s claim that the one-way speed of light “is in reality neither a supposition nor a hypothesis about the physical nature of light, but a stipulation which I can make of my own freewill in order to arrive at a definition of simultaneity” [emphasis in original] (Einstein 1916).  Conversely, Dennis claims that Einstein is wrong and that the one-way speed of light is necessarily the same as the round-trip speed of light: c = 186,282.397 miles per second in vacuum.  However, we have already shown that Dennis’s previous attempts to prove this were fallacious because they begged the question.  That is, Dennis had used equations that tacitly assume the one-way speed of light.  In his latest article, Dennis claims that the one-way speed of light has been empirically measured in two independent experiments.  We will examine the first of these here.  We will again show that Dennis has once again begged the question.  That is, he unwittingly assumed the one-way speed of light is isotropic in his argument.

Refuting Phillip Dennis’s Errors in Physics, ASC, and Philosophy – Part 2

In this article, we review – at a layman level – the original argument that Phil Dennis made against ASC and my refutation of his claims.  This is important for two reasons.  First, Dennis’s first article contained a great deal of mathematics, and this required me to reply in kind.  Therefore, my goal here is to explain the disagreement between us without using any equations so that the layman may understand the essence of the dispute. 

Refuting Phillip Dennis’s Errors in Physics, ASC, and Philosophy – Part 1

This article series will be very important for those interested in the distant starlight issue.  Secular astronomers claim that the light from the most distant galaxies has taken billions of years to reach Earth.  We can see these galaxies in our most powerful telescopes.  Many people conclude from this that the universe must be billions of years old, and therefore that the biblical description of creation is false.  But the notion that light takes billions of years to get from distant galaxies to Earth is predicated upon a particular modern convention of how we choose to define the timing of distant events. 

A Refutation of Phillip Dennis’s Claims Regarding Alleged Inconsistencies in ASC

Did Phillip Dennis actually disprove the conventionality thesis (Dennis 2024)?  Did he really prove at long last what physicists over the last century have been unable to do – to establish that the one-way speed of light in any given direction must be the same as the round-trip speed of light?  Did he find any genuine inconsistency with the Anisotropic Synchrony Convention (ASC) and the young universe model upon which it is based?  Well, no to all of the above…. We show below that when the full synchrony-independent equations are used, they do not support Dennis’s conclusion but rather the opposite.  Furthermore, we will demonstrate several critical errors in Dennis’s analysis and show that several of his claims are incompatible with the physics of relativity.

Quantum Particles: Gauge Bosons

In Christ all things are held together (Colossians 1:17).  Since God is an intelligent and logical Being Who holds the universe together by His power, and since we are made in His image and have revelation from Him, it is possible for us to discover some of the logical patterns by which Christ holds His universe together.  There are four fundamental forces in nature, each of which is an expression of the mathematical way God’s mind upholds creation.  Each of these four forces is associated with quantum particles called gauge bosons.  These gauge bosons are the glue that holds matter together.  When we study these forces, we are learning something about the mind of God.

Quantum Particles: Mesons

The Lord has determined the laws of nature and the kinds of particles that can exist so that our universe has the right properties for life.  Biology is possible because of chemistry, which is possible because of physics: the elementary particles God created and the rules governing them.  A slight change in the properties of particles or the laws they obey, and atoms could not exist and biological life would be impossible.  The intelligence needed to construct the right particles and laws such that biological life can exist is far beyond the combined mental capacity of all people who have ever lived.  Quantum particles give us a bit of insight into the infinite mind of the Lord.