Next YouTube Live Event (Dr. Jason Lisle)

Day(s)

:

Hour(s)

:

Minute(s)

:

Second(s)

Is Genesis Historic and Reliable?

Our feedback this week comes from Colin who believes that the Bible is “historized” fiction and not reliable in terms of science. Here are his comments in purple text along with my response.

Evolution vs. Science

Evolution is fundamentally incompatible with the scientific method. That is, if neo-Darwinian evolution is true, then there would be no rational basis for trusting in scientific procedures. Conversely, if science is a reliable tool for understanding how the universe works, then particles-to-people evolution cannot be true.

Ultima Thule

A few days ago, the New Horizon’s spacecraft flew past the small trans-Neptunian object, 2014 MU69. At a distance of over 4 billion miles from earth, MU69 is the most distant object ever visited by a manmade instrument.

The Christmas Star

What was the star that led the wise men to Christ? Was it a conjunction of planets, a comet, a supernova, a moon, an angel, or something else? Opinions abound, but many of them do not fit the details of the biblical text. What does the Bible have to say about this star?

Darwin’s Trap

When Charles Darwin wrote “On the Origin of Species” in 1859, he employed an ingenious trick to persuade people of evolution. He linked evolution to natural selection, implying that natural selection was the mechanism of evolution. This was a clever trap because when something false (evolution) is linked with something true (natural selection), people are often fooled.

William Lane Craig on Genesis

Our critic this week is Dr. William Lane Craig, a philosophy professor and Christian apologist. Although Craig defends Scripture in some areas, he adamantly denies literal (6-day) creation in favor of the big bang and secular timescale.

Most Recent Articles

Is Genesis Historic and Reliable?

Is Genesis Historic and Reliable?

Our feedback this week comes from Colin who believes that the Bible is “historized” fiction and not reliable in terms of science. Here are his comments in purple text along with my response.

read more
Evolution vs. Science

Evolution vs. Science

Evolution is fundamentally incompatible with the scientific method. That is, if neo-Darwinian evolution is true, then there would be no rational basis for trusting in scientific procedures. Conversely, if science is a reliable tool for understanding how the universe works, then particles-to-people evolution cannot be true.

read more
Ultima Thule

Ultima Thule

A few days ago, the New Horizon’s spacecraft flew past the small trans-Neptunian object, 2014 MU69. At a distance of over 4 billion miles from earth, MU69 is the most distant object ever visited by a manmade instrument.

read more
The Christmas Star

The Christmas Star

What was the star that led the wise men to Christ? Was it a conjunction of planets, a comet, a supernova, a moon, an angel, or something else? Opinions abound, but many of them do not fit the details of the biblical text. What does the Bible have to say about this star?

read more
Darwin’s Trap

Darwin’s Trap

When Charles Darwin wrote “On the Origin of Species” in 1859, he employed an ingenious trick to persuade people of evolution. He linked evolution to natural selection, implying that natural selection was the mechanism of evolution. This was a clever trap because when something false (evolution) is linked with something true (natural selection), people are often fooled.

read more
William Lane Craig on Genesis

William Lane Craig on Genesis

Our critic this week is Dr. William Lane Craig, a philosophy professor and Christian apologist. Although Craig defends Scripture in some areas, he adamantly denies literal (6-day) creation in favor of the big bang and secular timescale.

read more
Understanding Bahnsen…  Again

Understanding Bahnsen… Again

Our feedback this week once again comes from Peter who is still convinced that I have misrepresented the presuppositional method. Peter claims that (1) all forms of circular reasoning are fallacious and (2) that the presuppositional method as advanced by Bahnsen and Van Til does not involve any circular reasoning.

read more

Is Genesis Historic and Reliable?

Our feedback this week comes from Colin who believes that the Bible is “historized” fiction and not reliable in terms of science. Here are his comments in purple text along with my response.

read more

Evolution vs. Science

Evolution is fundamentally incompatible with the scientific method. That is, if neo-Darwinian evolution is true, then there would be no rational basis for trusting in scientific procedures. Conversely, if science is a reliable tool for understanding how the universe works, then particles-to-people evolution cannot be true.

read more

Ultima Thule

A few days ago, the New Horizon’s spacecraft flew past the small trans-Neptunian object, 2014 MU69. At a distance of over 4 billion miles from earth, MU69 is the most distant object ever visited by a manmade instrument.

read more

The Christmas Star

What was the star that led the wise men to Christ? Was it a conjunction of planets, a comet, a supernova, a moon, an angel, or something else? Opinions abound, but many of them do not fit the details of the biblical text. What does the Bible have to say about this star?

read more

Darwin’s Trap

When Charles Darwin wrote “On the Origin of Species” in 1859, he employed an ingenious trick to persuade people of evolution. He linked evolution to natural selection, implying that natural selection was the mechanism of evolution. This was a clever trap because when something false (evolution) is linked with something true (natural selection), people are often fooled.

read more

William Lane Craig on Genesis

Our critic this week is Dr. William Lane Craig, a philosophy professor and Christian apologist. Although Craig defends Scripture in some areas, he adamantly denies literal (6-day) creation in favor of the big bang and secular timescale.

read more

Understanding Bahnsen… Again

Our feedback this week once again comes from Peter who is still convinced that I have misrepresented the presuppositional method. Peter claims that (1) all forms of circular reasoning are fallacious and (2) that the presuppositional method as advanced by Bahnsen and Van Til does not involve any circular reasoning.

read more

Forum

Ask questions in the online forum and have them answered by Dr. Jason Lisle and other Ph.D. scientists.

Partner

Learn how you can partner with the Biblical Science Institute

Article Archives

Live Events

February 15-17, Lincoln, Nebraska
Indian Hills Community Church
1000 S. 84th street
15th 7:00 p.m. The Ultimate Proof of Creation
16th 9:00 a.m. Science Confirms the Bible
16th 11:00 a.m. The Secret Code of Creation
16th 1:30 p.m. Q & A
17th 9:00 a.m. Worlds of Creation
17th 10:00 a.m. Understanding Genesis
17th 6:00 p.m. Astronomy Reveals Creation

February 24 Lilburn, Georgia
Calvary Chapel Stone Mountain

March 8-10, Canada
March 8-9 Be Ready conference, Edmonton
March 9-10 Be Ready conference, Calgary

March 24 Colorado Springs, CO
Hope Chapel

March 29-30, Keene TX

April 7, Arden, NC

April 18, Williamstown, KY
Answering Atheists conference
at the Ark Encounter

May 2-3, Denver, CO

May 5, Colorado Springs, CO

May 17-18 Kootenai, ID

May 23-25  Orlando, FL
FPEA – Homeschool Convention

 

Weekly Show

Recent Video

Subscribe to Newsletter