Refuting Phillip Dennis’s Errors in Physics, ASC, and Philosophy – Part 5
We have been critiquing Phillip Dennis’s claims that the one-way speed of light must be c in all directions. Einstein claimed that the one-way speed of light was merely a humanly stipulated convention, something that we get to choose in order to define what constitutes simultaneous events that are separated by some distance. Dennis disagrees but has been unable to construct a cogent argument for his claim that doesn’t beg the question. Why does Dennis disagree with Einstein on this issue? I suggested in my previous response to Dennis that it may stem from Dennis’s philosophy of presentism. But what is presentism? Is it a self-consistent, logical philosophy? Is presentism compatible with Scripture?