Refuting Phillip Dennis’s Errors in Physics, ASC, and Philosophy – Part 3

We have been analyzing the claims of Phillip Dennis and his criticism of the ASC model.  In particular, Dennis claims to have refuted the conventionality thesis – Einstein’s claim that the one-way speed of light “is in reality neither a supposition nor a hypothesis about the physical nature of light, but a stipulation which I can make of my own freewill in order to arrive at a definition of simultaneity” [emphasis in original] (Einstein 1916).  Conversely, Dennis claims that Einstein is wrong and that the one-way speed of light is necessarily the same as the round-trip speed of light: c = 186,282.397 miles per second in vacuum.  However, we have already shown that Dennis’s previous attempts to prove this were fallacious because they begged the question.  That is, Dennis had used equations that tacitly assume the one-way speed of light.  In his latest article, Dennis claims that the one-way speed of light has been empirically measured in two independent experiments.  We will examine the first of these here.  We will again show that Dennis has once again begged the question.  That is, he unwittingly assumed the one-way speed of light is isotropic in his argument.

Refuting Phillip Dennis’s Errors in Physics, ASC, and Philosophy – Part 1

This article series will be very important for those interested in the distant starlight issue.  Secular astronomers claim that the light from the most distant galaxies has taken billions of years to reach Earth.  We can see these galaxies in our most powerful telescopes.  Many people conclude from this that the universe must be billions of years old, and therefore that the biblical description of creation is false.  But the notion that light takes billions of years to get from distant galaxies to Earth is predicated upon a particular modern convention of how we choose to define the timing of distant events.